How to Hire QA Engineers or Choose Testing Companies in the UK

Transparency note: This article is written from the perspective of Hireo, a recruitment platform built by BetterQA — a software testing company that operates globally including the UK market. We'll provide objective guidance on both internal hiring and vendor selection while acknowledging our involvement in both spaces.

The UK software testing market presents unique challenges: competitive talent demand in London and the Southeast, GDPR compliance requirements that matter more post-Brexit, and a vendor landscape ranging from global consultancies to specialized boutiques. This guide helps you navigate whether to hire QA engineers directly or partner with a testing company, then execute that decision effectively within UK market constraints.

Understanding the UK QA Landscape

The British software testing market divides cleanly between London and everywhere else. London-based QA engineers command £50,000-£80,000 for mid-level roles, with senior automation engineers reaching £90,000-£120,000. Outside the M25, salaries drop 20-30% — Manchester, Birmingham, and Edinburgh offer strong technical talent at £40,000-£65,000 for comparable experience.

This geographic salary arbitrage creates an immediate decision point: hire remotely from lower-cost UK regions, hire locally and pay London rates, or work with a testing company that maintains teams across multiple locations. Using a platform like Hireo helps you access candidates nationwide rather than limiting yourself to commutable distance from your office.

The UK market also carries specific compliance overhead that affects both hiring and vendor selection. GDPR enforcement remains active post-Brexit, Right to Work checks require proper documentation, and IR35 regulations complicate contractor relationships. These factors don't make either path impossible, but they add administrative burden that companies often underestimate.

UK companies increasingly compete with European and US firms for the same QA talent through remote work. A Manchester-based QA engineer can now choose between a £55,000 local offer and a €70,000 remote position with a Berlin startup. Your ability to hire depends on total compensation and employer brand, not just salary figures.

Financial Reality: UK Hiring vs Outsourcing Costs

A mid-level QA engineer hired in London at £60,000 costs approximately £78,000 in employer National Insurance, pension contributions, and benefits. Add recruitment costs — £12,000-£18,000 if using agencies, or 2-3 months of internal recruiting time — plus equipment, training, and management overhead. True first-year cost approaches £95,000-£105,000 for a productive team member.

Software testing companies operating in the UK typically charge £50-£90 per hour for senior QA engineers, translating to £87,000-£157,000 annually per full-time equivalent. The hourly rate looks expensive compared to salary costs, but you're paying for immediate availability, established processes, and the vendor's responsibility to maintain quality regardless of individual employee turnover.

The cost calculation shifts when you factor in recruitment timeline risk. Every month spent recruiting is a month without testing coverage, which translates to defects reaching production or delayed releases. If that delay costs you a quarter's revenue growth, the £15,000 premium for outsourced testing becomes negligible compared to the business impact of waiting for internal hiring to complete.

UK-specific costs affect both paths differently. Employer NI and pension auto-enrollment add 16-18% to salary costs for internal hiring. For outsourcing, you pay a single invoice without worrying about HMRC compliance, holiday entitlement calculations, or statutory sick pay. The administrative simplicity of outsourcing has particular value for startups and scale-ups that haven't built HR infrastructure yet.

Top QA Companies: Key Players in the UK Market

The UK testing market offers three distinct vendor categories, each serving different needs and budgets.

Global consultancies — Accenture, Capgemini, Cognizant, and Infosys maintain major UK operations serving enterprise clients. These firms provide comprehensive testing services backed by standardized methodologies and global delivery models. Their strength is handling large-scale transformation projects for FTSE 100 companies. Their weakness is cost and inflexibility — minimum engagements typically start at £250,000 annually with rigid contract terms.

Specialized testing companies — BetterQA, Sogeti (part of Capgemini but operates semi-independently), Qawerk, and Testlio focus exclusively on quality assurance rather than broad IT services. These companies work primarily with scale-ups and mid-market firms, providing senior engineers who understand modern development practices. They balance technical depth with commercial accessibility — you're not paying enterprise overhead, but you get experts who specialize in testing.

BetterQA operates from Cluj-Napoca, Romania but serves UK clients through remote delivery and occasional on-site presence. This model provides access to senior QA engineers at 30-40% lower rates than London-based vendors while maintaining UK business hours and English fluency. Other European testing companies including Abstracta (Uruguay), QASource (India), and TestDevLab (Latvia) offer similar geographic arbitrage.

UK-native boutiques — Smaller firms like Zuhlke, Scott Logic, and Foundation QA typically employ 10-50 people and focus on specific industries or technologies. These companies offer deep expertise in particular domains (financial services testing, embedded systems, accessibility) and often provide better cultural fit than offshore vendors. Their limitation is capacity — they can't rapidly scale to 20+ engineers on your project.

The vendor selection decision depends partly on your internal QA maturity. If you have experienced QA leadership who can properly scope work and evaluate deliverables, working with offshore specialists like BetterQA maximizes value. If you lack testing expertise internally, paying a premium for a UK-based firm that can provide strategic guidance along with execution may be worthwhile.

Talent Availability: Can You Actually Hire?

The UK QA job market has tightened considerably since 2020. Remote work eliminated geographic constraints, meaning your London job posting competes with opportunities from across Europe and the US. Experienced test automation engineers receive multiple offers within a week of indicating availability, giving them leverage to demand higher salaries and better conditions.

Specific skill shortages affect different testing specializations unequally. Manual testers remain relatively available at £30,000-£45,000, but manual testing alone provides insufficient coverage for modern web and mobile applications. Test automation engineers with Selenium, Playwright, or Cypress experience command premium salaries and have extensive choice. Security testing specialists and performance engineers are even more scarce.

Your employer brand significantly impacts hiring success. Established tech companies like Deliveroo, Revolut, or Monzo can hire QA engineers relatively easily based on reputation and visible products. A B2B SaaS startup without consumer presence struggles to compete for attention in candidate markets. Hireo helps by processing more candidates faster, but it doesn't solve the fundamental problem of competing against better-known employers.

Geographic location affects talent availability beyond just salary expectations. London provides the largest QA talent pool but also the most competition for that talent. Manchester, Edinburgh, and Bristol offer growing tech communities with less competition, making them potentially easier hiring markets. Fully remote hiring opens access to the entire UK talent pool but requires competitive compensation since candidates can also access European and US remote opportunities.

The outsourcing path completely bypasses local talent constraints. When you work with a testing company, your vendor absorbs recruitment challenges while you focus on product development. This advantage matters most for specialized skills — if you need a QA engineer with financial services domain knowledge and mobile automation expertise, recruiting that person yourself might take 9-12 months. A specialized vendor either has that person on staff or can recruit them more efficiently than you can.

Speed to Deployment: Timeline Comparison

Internal QA hiring in the UK follows a predictable timeline that often stretches longer than anticipated. You need 1-2 weeks to finalize job descriptions and get headcount approval, 4-8 weeks to source candidates through job boards and agencies, 2-3 weeks for interview rounds, then 1-8 weeks notice period depending on seniority. Realistically, you're looking at 3-5 months from "we need QA" to having a productive team member.

Using Hireo compresses the sourcing and screening phases by automating CV parsing and candidate matching. Instead of manually reviewing 200 CVs, you upload job requirements and get ranked candidates with relevant experience in minutes. This can reduce time-to-hire from 5 months to 2-3 months, but you still face the fundamental constraint of candidate notice periods and interview scheduling.

Working with software testing companies collapses the timeline to 1-2 weeks. Established vendors maintain bench capacity or can quickly assign engineers from completing projects. Once contracts are signed and access is provisioned, you can have QA engineers running tests within days. If you're launching a product in 6 weeks and just realized you need testing coverage, outsourcing is your only viable option — internal hiring won't complete in time.

The speed advantage extends beyond initial deployment. When an internal QA engineer quits, you're back to the 3-5 month hiring cycle with added knowledge transfer burden. When an outsourced engineer rotates off your project, your vendor handles replacement within 1-2 weeks while maintaining continuity through documentation and handoff procedures. The knowledge lives in the vendor organization rather than individual employees.

UK-specific factors affect both timelines. Right to Work checks add 1-2 weeks to hiring if sponsoring visas, though EU citizens who had UK residence before Brexit retain work rights. Agencies typically charge 15-25% of first-year salary, with payment due when the candidate starts. For outsourcing, contracts often require legal review which can add 2-4 weeks to initial engagement but runs faster for contract extensions.

GDPR and Compliance Considerations

Post-Brexit UK GDPR enforcement creates compliance obligations that affect both hiring and vendor selection. Internal QA engineers need access to production data for realistic testing, which means they're processing personal information under GDPR. Your company remains the data controller, but you're responsible for ensuring employees understand and follow data protection requirements.

This compliance burden includes proper training, access controls, and audit trails showing how test data is used and protected. For a single QA hire, this overhead is manageable. For a growing testing team, you need formal processes, regular training updates, and potentially a dedicated data protection resource to maintain compliance.

Working with software testing companies transfers some compliance responsibility to your vendor, but you remain accountable as the data controller. Your contract must specify how the testing company handles personal data, what security controls they maintain, and how they demonstrate GDPR compliance. Vendors operating in the EU including BetterQA already comply with GDPR since it applies across the European Economic Area.

The practical advantage of outsourcing appears in specialized compliance areas. If you're building financial services software requiring FCA compliance, or healthcare applications subject to NHS data standards, finding QA engineers who understand these frameworks is difficult. Specialized testing companies work across multiple clients in regulated industries, building expertise your internal team would take years to develop.

Right to Work compliance affects internal hiring but not outsourcing. When hiring employees, you must verify and document their legal right to work in the UK, maintain copies of verification documents, and conduct follow-up checks for time-limited permissions. Working with a UK-registered testing company eliminates this obligation — the vendor handles Right to Work compliance for their employees.

Integration and Cultural Fit

Internal QA engineers naturally integrate with your engineering culture through daily interaction, shared Slack channels, and participation in team rituals. This cultural integration often leads to better collaboration — QA engineers who pair with developers catch issues earlier, and developers who understand testing constraints write more testable code.

The integration advantage matters most for product companies building complex software where testing needs tight coupling with development. A fintech startup building a mobile banking app benefits from QA engineers who sit in daily standups, challenge product decisions during planning, and build relationships with designers and developers. The cultural context they acquire accelerates problem-solving and improves product quality beyond pure defect detection.

Outsourced QA teams face cultural distance by default. They're not in your office (even if you have one), they're not invited to company socials, and they don't build organic relationships with your internal team. Overcoming this distance requires intentional process design: dedicated Slack channels, weekly video syncs, inclusion in sprint planning, and treating external QA as an extension of your engineering team rather than a separate vendor.

Companies that succeed with outsourced testing actively work to build cultural bridges. They invite QA vendors to product demos, include them in architecture discussions, and create feedback loops where testers can suggest product improvements rather than just logging defects. Companies that fail treat outsourced QA as a black box — throwing work over the wall and expecting defect reports back.

The UK market offers a middle path through embedded contractors. Some testing companies including BetterQA provide engineers who work from your office (when you have one) and participate in your culture while remaining vendor employees. This model combines cultural integration with contractual flexibility, though it typically costs 10-15% more than pure remote delivery and works better for London-based companies that can absorb the overhead.

Decision Framework for UK Companies

Choose internal hiring when:

You have predictable, consistent testing needs that justify permanent headcount. Your product complexity and domain specificity mean ramp-up time investment pays back through years of accumulated knowledge. You have existing QA leadership who can recruit, train, and manage growing teams. You can compete for UK QA talent through either strong employer brand or above-market compensation. Your product requires deep integration between testing and development that benefits from cultural embedding.

Choose testing companies when:

You need QA capacity faster than 3-5 month UK hiring timelines allow. Your testing requirements fluctuate between project phases or product launches. You lack internal QA expertise and need strategic guidance along with execution. UK talent market constraints or budget limitations prevent hiring qualified engineers locally. You need specialized skills — security testing, performance engineering, accessibility — that would take too long to recruit for. You're optimizing for product development velocity and can't afford the overhead of building HR infrastructure yet.

Choose a hybrid approach when:

You want strategic control through an internal QA lead but need execution flexibility through outsourced capacity. You're scaling from zero QA maturity and need an external partner to build foundations before transitioning to internal ownership. You have core testing work that justifies permanent team members, plus specialized or overflow work better suited to external experts. You're geographically distributed across multiple UK offices and want testing coverage that doesn't depend on individual office headcount.

The pattern that works for many UK scale-ups: start with outsourcing to BetterQA or similar specialized firms to establish testing coverage quickly, hire your first senior QA engineer to own strategy once you understand your needs, then maintain the outsourcing relationship for specialized work and capacity management. This minimizes risk while building toward internal capability.

Tools Included: Supporting Your Choice

Regardless of which path you choose, effective QA requires supporting infrastructure:

Hireo provides AI-powered CV screening and candidate matching if you decide to build an internal UK team. The platform processes CVs from Indeed, CV-Library, and Reed, automatically extracting skills and experience to match against your requirements. This reduces time spent on manual CV review from weeks to hours, helping you compete in fast-moving UK hiring markets.

Auditi offers WCAG accessibility testing — a requirement under UK Equality Act 2010 for public sector websites and increasingly expected for private sector digital services. Whether you hire internally or outsource, accessibility testing requires specialized knowledge that Auditi provides through automated scanning and expert review.

BugBoard provides test case management and defect tracking for both internal and outsourced teams. The platform creates transparency for outsourced QA relationships — you can see exactly what testing is happening, what issues are being found, and how vendor time is being used. For internal teams, BugBoard provides professional tooling from day one.

Making Your Decision in the UK Market

The build-versus-buy decision for UK QA comes down to three factors: urgency, budget predictability, and access to talent. If you have 4-6 months to hire and budget for £75,000-£100,000 fully loaded costs in London (or £55,000-£75,000 outside), building an internal team provides long-term knowledge accumulation. If you need coverage in weeks, have variable testing needs, or can't compete for UK QA talent, outsourcing provides faster deployment and lower risk.

Most successful UK tech companies discover the right answer combines both approaches. A senior internal QA engineer who owns your testing strategy and understands UK compliance requirements, supported by an outsourced team from BetterQA or similar companies for execution and specialized skills, balances strategic continuity with operational flexibility.

The worst decision is delaying until the perfect answer becomes clear. Start with whichever path you can deploy fastest, learn from 3-6 months of experience, then adjust. You'll understand your actual testing needs better from working with an outsourced team for one quarter than from spending six months planning the perfect internal hire.

About the Author

Sarah Chen is Recruitment Strategy Lead at Hireo, where she helps companies build engineering teams across multiple geographies including the UK. She previously managed technical recruiting for a London-based fintech startup, handling both internal hiring and vendor relationships. Her experience includes recruiting QA engineers across London, Manchester, and Edinburgh markets.

Built by BetterQA